Body-Pin Rigidity

6. Degeneracy strata and the route not taken🔗

Section 4 of Zheng (2026) recasts the stress–codimension inequality geometrically. On the root-fixed space of pairwise-distinct configurations it forms the degeneracy loci \Sigma_s(F), the placements whose self-stress space has dimension at least s, as determinantal subschemes of a two-term complex, and it proves that the universal infinitesimal-motion cone is a local complete intersection, hence Cohen–Macaulay and pure-dimensional. None of that is formalized: the Lean development works with the field-theoretic inequality of Theorem 1.2 throughout, and Theorem A.1 does not depend on the scheme statements. From this section the formal argument uses only what the paper calls the grounded model — fixing a root vertex removes the common translations without changing the self-stresses — and the equivalence of the grounded inequality (4.7) with Theorem 1.2, which the paper proves inside the proof of Theorem 4.2. We state the section's two scheme-theoretic claims first, and then the grounded equivalence, which is the part with a Lean counterpart.

Rank-deficiency loci of rigidity matrices are a classical subject: the pure condition of White and Whiteley (1983) and White and Whiteley (1987) describes the rank-deficient realizations of isostatic bar–joint and body–bar frameworks, and later work stratified configuration spaces of tensegrities by the dimension of the self-stress space and studied rigidity through tangent spaces to measurement varieties ((Doray et al., 2010); (Karpenkov, 2021); (Gortler et al., 2010)). Section 4's contribution is a uniform codimension bound for every finite simple (2,2)-sparse graph and every s, derived from the collinearity-flag induction of the flags chapter.

  1. 6.1. The direction complex and its degeneracy loci
  2. 6.2. The codimension theorem for the strata
  3. 6.3. The grounded model