6.3. The grounded model
The part of the section the formal argument uses is its first paragraph and
equation (4.7). Both directions of the main theorem work with a root vertex
fixed at the origin: the necessity direction grounds by fixing one block's
twist to zero, and the self-stress estimate used by the sufficiency direction
is stated over configurations with a_o = 0. The word grounded for this
operation is the paper's own, used also by the formalization's module names;
it does not appear in the reference papers, and it is not the pinned
framework of Király and Tanigawa (2019), in which the pinned
points are fixed completely in the ambient space — grounding fixes one point
and removes only the translations, and in a body–pin graph the word pin is
already taken. The equivalence with the ungrounded inequality of Theorem 1.2
is the following lemma.
Let a : V \to K^3 be an injective configuration with a_o = 0 whose
nonroot coordinates generate the extension K/k. Theorem 1.2 is equivalent
to the grounded inequality
\dim_K \ker D_F(a)^T + \trdeg_k K \le 3n_0.
(Zheng, 2026, Equation 4.7)
Lean code for Lemma6.3.1●2 declarations
Associated Lean declarations
-
abbrevdefined in RB31EndToEnd/Linear/GroundedDirectionConstraint.leancomplete
abbrev RB31E2E.GroundedDirectionConstraint.GroundedSpatialCoordinate.{u_2} {V : Type u_2} (root : V) : Type u_2
abbrev RB31E2E.GroundedDirectionConstraint.GroundedSpatialCoordinate.{u_2} {V : Type u_2} (root : V) : Type u_2
The three coordinate labels at all non-root vertices.
-
theoremdefined in RB31EndToEnd/Linear/GroundedDirectionConstraint.leancomplete
theorem RB31E2E.GroundedDirectionConstraint.ker_synthesis_eq_directionStressSpace.{u_1, u_2} {k : Type u_1} {V : Type u_2} [Field k] [Fintype V] [DecidableEq V] (root : V) (F : RB31E2E.SimpleEdgeSet V) (a : V → Fin 3 → k) : (RB31E2E.GroundedDirectionConstraint.synthesis root F a).ker = RB31E2E.DirectionStress.DirectionStressSpace F a
theorem RB31E2E.GroundedDirectionConstraint.ker_synthesis_eq_directionStressSpace.{u_1, u_2} {k : Type u_1} {V : Type u_2} [Field k] [Fintype V] [DecidableEq V] (root : V) (F : RB31E2E.SimpleEdgeSet V) (a : V → Fin 3 → k) : (RB31E2E.GroundedDirectionConstraint.synthesis root F a).ker = RB31E2E.DirectionStress.DirectionStressSpace F a
Restricting equilibrium output to non-root blocks preserves the stress kernel literally.
Given Theorem 1.2, take three parameters z = (z_1, z_2, z_3) algebraically
independent over K and translate every point by z over K(z). The
rigidity matrix is unchanged, the translated coordinates generate K(z),
and \trdeg_k K(z) = \trdeg_k K + 3; applying Theorem 1.2 to the translated
configuration and removing the three added parameters gives the grounded
inequality. Conversely, subtract a_o from an arbitrary configuration and
let L be the field generated by the coordinate differences. The rigidity
matrix is defined over L and rank does not change under the scalar
extension K/L, while K is generated by L and the three coordinates
of a_o, so \trdeg_k K \le \trdeg_k L + 3; applying the grounded
inequality to a - a_o gives Theorem 1.2.
The formalization grounds by index type rather than by deleting columns: the
grounded coordinates form the type
GroundedSpatialCoordinate,
with three spatial coordinates at each vertex other than the root, and the
ambient count 3n_0 is its cardinality.
/-- Bodies other than the selected grounded body. -/
abbrev OffRoot (root : W) := {w : W // w ≠ root}/-- The three coordinate labels at all non-root vertices. -/
abbrev GroundedSpatialCoordinate (root : V) := OffRoot root × Fin 3
The vertex blocks of every rigidity row sum to zero, which is the paper's
observation (4.1), formalized as
sum_directionRow_eq_zero;
hence restricting the equilibrium output to the non-root blocks leaves the
self-stress space of F literally unchanged, which
ker_synthesis_eq_directionStressSpace
states, and grounding removes only the translations.
Of the paper's two directions, the formalization needs the one from the
ungrounded inequality to the grounded one: the grounded form is the sole
self-stress hypothesis of the assembly theorem in
the body–pin chapter, and its derivation from
the flag theorem — by the same device of adjoining three translation
parameters, over \Q and with the cancellation made explicit — is recorded
on the Theorem 1.2 node of the flags chapter.